Tag Archives: parking

THE BUSINESS OF PARKING: A Legal Framework for AV Implementation

By Michael Ash, Esq., CRE

THE PROSPECT OF FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES (AVs) creates an opportunity to reshape all aspects of modern life. As AVs move from the workshop to the real world, on-road testing and early deployments will be critical to improving performance to accurately detect and anticipate complications. However, to realize the full potential of the emerging technology, mobility professionals must align with legal experts and legislators to cre­ate the framework for the safe and efficient development of autonomous vehicle technology.

In October 2018, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) released new federal guidance for AVs, “Prepar­ing for the Future of Transportation: Automated Vehicles 3.0” (AV 3.0), advancing its commitment to supporting the safe integration of automation into the broad multimodal surface transportation system. AV 3.0 outlines broad im­plementation of a legal framework on the federal level for the deployment of autonomous vehicle technology.

The Objectives of AV 3.0

AV 3.0 incorporates the results of extensive stakeholder engagement by USDOT to provide updated voluntary guid­ance and policy considerations for a range of industry sec­tors, including manufacturers and technology developers, infrastructure owners and operators, commercial motor carriers, and state and local governments. As stated in AV 3.0, USDOT seeks to pursue the following activities:

  • Establish performance-oriented, consensus-based, and voluntary standards and guidance for vehicle and infra­structure safety, mobility, and operations.
  • Conduct targeted research to support the safe integra­tion of automation.
  • Identify and remove regulatory barriers to the safe inte­gration of AVs.
  • Ensure national consistency for travel in interstate commerce.
  • Educate the public on the capabilities and limitations of AVs.

Rather than create a byzantine regulatory framework first and expect the AV industry to develop within its con­straints, the policy statement helps outline a process for USDOT to regulate new technology as innovations develop, with input from all participants. With the publication of AV 3.0, USDOT announced several upcoming rulemakings and other actions under consideration:

1. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will request public comment on a proposal to streamline and modernize the procedures it will follow when processing and deciding exemption petitions.

2. The Federal Highway Administration announced plans to update the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, taking into consideration new connected and AV technologies.

3. The Federal Railroad Administration is initiating re­search to develop and demonstrate a concept of oper­ations, including system requirements, for the use of automated and connected vehicles to improve safety of highway-rail crossings.

4. The Maritime Administration and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration are evaluating the regulatory and economic feasibility of using automated truck queueing as a technology solution to truck staging, access, and parking issues at ports.

5. The Federal Transit Administration has published a five-year research plan on automating bus transit.

Implementation

USDOT is committed to five core strategies:

1. Engage stakeholders and the public as the central point between academia, private industry, public sector agen­cies, and research organizations.

2. Provide best practices and policy considerations to support stakeholders as they work to better understand automation, how it may impact their roles and respon­sibilities, and how best to integrate automated vehicles into existing and future transportation networks.

3. Support voluntary technical standards by working with stakeholders and developers to support technical stan­dards and policies development created by industry groups.

4. Conduct targeted technical research to inform policy decisions and agency actions through critical research and data analysis.

5. Modernize regulations as existing federal regulations and standards may pose challenges to the widespread integration of AVs as many current regulations are based on the assumption of the presence of a human driver.

The publication of AV 3.0 is an acknowledgement of the paradigm shift that will open the door for innovation and experimentation in the real world to safely develop AV technology. There is a clear policy goal to support emerging technologies and to not stifle the revolution of the transportation and mobility industry. There will be op­portunities for IPMI’s membership to engage with USDOT and play a major role in this process. Parking and mobility professionals are encouraged to review AV 3.0 in full at bit.ly/AV30.
This article is the first in a four-part series on the legal challenges presented by emerging technologies.

Read the article here.

MICHAEL J. ASH, Esq., CRE, is partner with Carlin & Ward. He can be reached at michael.ash@carlinward.com.

There is a clear policy goal to support emerging technologies and to not stifle the revolution of the transportation and mobility industry. WWW.TRANSPORTATION.GOV/AV/3

Developers: There’s Really Not Enough Parking

What if they built a transit station and people didn’t come, or at least took their time coming? That’s what’s happening in Tysons, Va., a busy, business-filled suburb of Washington, D.C., where parking maximums are putting the squeeze on roads–at least, according to developers.

Planners said a new Metro stop in the  business district would alleviate traffic. But so far, train use hasn’t been as high as was predicted and a group of developers testified this week that parking maximums implemented as part of a comprehensive plan for the area are choking roads, with people still circling and circling, looking for places to park. Real change to transportation is slow to come, they said, with one suggesting the construction of “throwaway parking decks” as a temporary solution while Metro use is given time to build. Another testified that driving through Tysons is part of the area’s DNA, and may take a long time to change.

Read the whole story here.

IPMI Moving Forward Video Series

Moving Forward is IPMI’s monthly professional development newsletter, highlighting educational opportunities and professional development tools and advice. Each newsletter features a new professional development video.

To watch all of the videos available, please search our Resource Center or check out our YouTube channel.

I'm Working from Home (Now What?)

Professional Development Series:  I'm Working from Home (Now what?)

Sponsorships

Sponsorships

Practical Capacity

Practical Capacity

Leadership for the Millennial

Leadership for the Millennial

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS)

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS)

How to Increase Parking Capacity without Building New Structures


How to Increase Parking Capacity without Building New Structures

Change Continuum


Change Continuum

Leadership as Easy as 1, 2, 3

Leadership as Easy as 1, 2, 3

July 2019: Technology VS. Human Interaction

July 2019: Technology vs. Human Interaction: Developing Millennial Leadership

June 2019: Mobile LPR Enforcement: Lessons Learned from Baylor University

June 2019:Mobile LPR Enforcement: Lessons Learned from Baylor University

May 2019: CAPP Update and Exam Changes

May 2019: CAPP Update and Exam Changes

April 2019: Sitting in the Right Seats - Maximizing Your Potential

April 2019: Sitting in the Right Seats - Maximizing Your Potential

March 2019: Embracing New Technology

March 2019: Embracing New Technology

February 2019: Dig Deeper - Creating Your Personal Mission Statement

February 2019: Dig Deeper - Creating Your  Personal Mission Statement

January 2019: Upcoming Education and Opportunities in 2019

January 2019: Upcoming Education and Opportunities in 2019

IPMI Webinar: Watch Your Assets! How to Monetize Most Effectively

Live Online Webcast: $35.00 for IPMI Members, $85.00 for Non-Members

Register Button

Description: In the next decade, a growing number of state and local governments, colleges and universities, airports, transit systems, and water and sewer authorities are likely to explore asset monetization. State and local governments own infrastructure properties of significant value and, despite a 10-year economic expansion, some remain fiscally pressured and unable to properly maintain their properties. The scale of today’s infrastructure decay, the declining fiscal health of the U.S. public sector, and a growing appetite from large institutional investors (private sector) for infrastructure properties make asset sales or leases more likely than in the past.

Parking assets (garages, decks, on-street operations) are often eyed by political administrations as a possible cash cow for their pet projects. Now, we see these assets used to fund much-needed infrastructure and technology upgrades.

Learning Objectives:

In this webinar, we will highlight the pros and cons of:

  • Buy outright; part of a system.
  • Sell or lease the entire system.
  • Lease-Leaseback.

Presenters: 

Mark Vergenes is the president of MIRUS Consultants.

Having entered the parking industry in late 1999, Mark has built a clientele that consists of real estate development firms, individuals, and cities. His practice focuses on consulting with those who need an experienced advisor for their project(s).

He is the co-author of A Guide To Parking; Chapter 9, “Economics and Finance” published by IPMI. You can also find him in IPMI’s magazine, The Parking Professional, where he is a financial columnist.

 

 

 

 

Tim Horstmann is a public finance and tax attorney at McNees Wallace & Nurick in Harrisburg, PA. Tim advises governmental entities on the structuring of taxable and tax-exempt revenue bond and general obligation bond financings for a variety of capital projects, including parking facilities, schools, and higher education institutions and water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure. He also represents clients in the monetization of publicly-owned assets through various arrangements such as sales, leases, sale/leasebacks, and lease/leasebacks.

IPMI On-Demand Webinar: Accessible Parking and Placard Abuse

On-Demand Webinar Fee: $35.00 for IPMI Members, $85.00 for Non-Members

Register Button

Description: Accessible parking challenges and disabled placard abuse are continuing challenges. While some federal standards exist, cities and states take a wide variety of approaches. For the first time, the issues are being considered on a national level by a broadly based united group. The IPMI-led Accessible Parking Coalition (APC) includes transportation officials, government agencies, advocacy groups, parking management and technology experts, veterans’ groups, civil rights advocates, and independent living movement members. Gain insights from APC research and resources, and learn how a number of municipalities and universities are addressing the issues successfully.

Learning Objectives:

  • Gain a comprehensive understanding of the challenges surrounding accessible parking problems and eliminating disabled placard/plate abuse.
  • Learn how to tap into available resources offered by the Accessible Parking Coalition.
  • Learn ways to successfully address the issues through innovative programs that are working for a number of municipalities and universities.

Presenters:

Gary Means, CAPP, holds a BA in broadcasting from Eastern Kentucky University and is executive director of the Lexington, Ky., Parking Authority. He is secretary of the IPMI Board of Directors. Locally, he serves on several downtown-oriented boards/committees including the YMCA, Downtown Lexington Management District, and the Downtown Lexington Partnership. Gary has worked in the parking industry for more than 22 years in both the public and private sectors.

 

 

 

 

 

Debbie Hoffman, CAPP, is director of transportations services at Texas A&M University. She serves on the board for the Center for Transportation Demand Management, as treasurer for the Red River Chapter of the Association of Commuter Transportation, and on IPMI’s Parking Matters committee. She holds a master of science degree from Texas A&M University. Her passion is bringing people together to develop creative, high-functioning solutions.

IPMI On-Demand Webinar: Curb Management: Strategies and Tech to Define, Manage, and Enforce the Curb

On-Demand Webinar: $35.00 for IPMI Members, $85.00 for Non-Members

Register Button

Description: Struggling with curb management or just starting to think about it? You’re not alone—balancing shared use of this limited and valuable real estate is a challenge, and it’s only projected to become more complicated from here. Learn what curb management is and how various technologies will support effective curb-sharing. This presentation explores four major categories of consideration and how technology will be applied to de-clutter and de-stress curb space.

Learning Objectives:

  • Develop a comprehensive understanding of the elements of curb management.
  • Understand the use and data elements that are required to define and manage the curb as a critical asset.
  • Discuss the established and emerging strategies and technologies that will help you charge for curb access appropriately and enforce access, restrictions, and more.

Presenters:

Mike Drow, CAPP, is senior vice president, corporate development, at T2 Systems, where he establishes and manages technology partnerships and acquisitions to align with the company’s long-term strategic goals. He has led the development of mobility services, remote management operations, mobile payments, and interactive marketing services, and has worked with municipalities, universities, airports, and urban garages. He is co-chair of IPMI’s Technology Committee.

 

 

 

 

 

Charles Debow is a managing member of D&D Advisory Group, a parking and mobility consulting firm.  He has extensive experience in the parking industry and is widely recognized as a technology and innovation leader. Prior to his current role, he served as SVP of sales and account management for Parkmobile, as director of municipal parking in State College, Pa., as well positions in private operations.  He serves on the IPMI Parking Technology Committee and is a frequent contributor to the IPMI magazine as well as the Blog.

The Green Standard: I Was Going to Recycle, but …

By Yasser Jabbari

YOU ARE LATE FOR WORK. You are carrying the breakfast that you some­how did not spill on yourself navigating through morning traffic. As you speed-walk through the parking lot, you come to a set of trash and recy­cling cans that have words on the front of them that you never really have time to read. What you do notice is that the trash cans have swinging doors on them, which means one of the hands being used to eat your breakfast is going to have to touch that door before you can throw away some of the trash from your car. Instead of doing that, you leave the trash on top of the container and never think about it again.

What was just described might be happening right now in any number of parking lots around the world. How do we convince our customers to act re­sponsibly with the trash they bring into the parking lot? On the other end of it, are we giving customers the right oppor­tunities in the right places to complete a sustainable act? A lack of trash cans or the wrong type of cans will negate any conscious effort to do the right thing.

Offering the Right Stuff
Disneyland has trash receptacles ev­ery 30 feet in any direction. They have figured out that people are only willing to walk 30 feet to throw out trash. They also have only two receptacles at any location: one for trash and one for glass and plastic bottles. The user’s choice becomes very simple at this point.

If you come across five different trash receptacles, are you going to stop and look at every single one to figure out which gets your half-eaten bagel and which gets your coffee cup, or are you just going to throw it in the trash and make peace with the compromise that it did not end up on the ground? The small impediments we as operators put in front of our customers will make or break whether a person makes the right choice.

The example given above was actual feedback our department received from customers in our parking lots. When it came time to replace the garbage can lids, the new ones were selected be­cause they had open lids that made it easy to just drop the trash in—no touch­ing with one’s hands.

Education
Along with accessibility and ease of use, sustainability needs to be driven with education, ideally before a customer even arrives at the parking facility. Operators can take advantage of the recycling and trash norms most people adhere to that dictate how to discard refuse in the right way. But do we know what happens to that trash after it leaves our facilities?
What was once recyclable is no longer recyclable, and a well-meaning customer in a parking lot who thinks he or she is doing the right thing may not actually be at all. We need to make sure that the customer has the proper information so he or she really does the right thing. This goes hand-in-hand with easily accessible facilities that make the proper choices possible.

Consider pizza boxes. A pizza box is made from cardboard; cardboard can be recycled, so that goes into the blue recy­cling container. In actuality, because of the grease in the pizza, that box actually can’t be recycled and is now a contam­inant in the recycling can. The same goes for paper cups or plates, which sometimes have plastic or petroleum lining to make them last longer. Contrary to first glance, these items are not re­cyclable and should be disposed of in a landfill bin.

In the end, the interaction between a customer and a trash can or recycling bin is very short and one-directional. To effect any kind of change, people must be educated before they ever come near a trash or recycling can so they can make the right choice.

While I applaud any organization that can effectively compost from a parking lot, most users of our facilities just want to be able to make a simple choice—the right choice—and move on with their day. Can we achieve that with a simple trash can and recycling bin and clear labeling? I believe that most people will use the receptacles as long as we don’t get in their way.

Read the article here.

YASSER JABBARI works in facilities for transportation and parking services at the University of California, Riverside, and is a member of IPMI’s Sustainability Committee. He can be reached at yasser.jabbari@ucr.edu.

 

The Business of Parking: It’s Time for Your ADA Audit

By Michael J. Ash, Esq., CRE

THE LATEST RULES FOR ACCESS AND ACCOMMODATIONS in public and private facilities have been in effect since 2010, when the U.S. Department of Justice issued updated regulations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Requirements about access and accommoda­tion have evolved since the 2010 regulations went into effect, as courts have interpreted the ADA regulations in response to litigation. While ADA regulations have very specific rules for public and private parking, lawsuits have created additional re­quirements for parking operators. Private and public parking operators should review their compliance with the ADA regulations and relevant judicial opin­ions in their jurisdictions to prevent expensive (and ­unanticipated) lawsuits.

The 2010 Regulations

The 2010 ADA amendments included new require­ments for the quantity of accessible parking spaces and van-accessible parking spaces:

  • Medical facilities require more accessible parking than other types of uses.
  • Accessible parking spaces must connect to the building entrance by the shortest possible route and/or must be dispersed throughout a parking facility that serves multiple buildings.
  • Accessible parking spaces must comply with strict design criteria to accommodate width, access aisles, and loading areas.
  • They must be clearly marked with signage and striping to identify the availability of the acces­sible space and discourage others from parking in them.
  • Accessible parking spaces should be maintained with a heightened standard of care to remove snow, debris, or other impediments to access.

Enforcement of the ADA regulations is often left to private parties and nonprofit advocacy groups through the filing of a lawsuit.

Drive-by Lawsuits
Complaints for non-compliant ADA facilities have increased dramatically since 2015. Under Title III of the ADA, a plaintiff is not entitled to money damages but can seek reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs. The provision for attorneys’ fees has created a niche practice area for attorneys filing lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs with disabilities.
Entities with perceived parking deficiencies are even more susceptible to lawsuits in violation of the ADA for “construction-related access claims.” These lawsuits are commonly referred to as drive-by lawsuits because a potential plaintiff does not need to get out of his or her vehicle or patronize the es­tablishment to spot a potential violation. It is not un­common for a parking operator who is targeted with this type of suit to remediate the perceived violation and pay a nuisance settlement rather than incur the costs to litigate the matter.

ADA compliance through litigation has changed the requirements for accessible parking above and beyond the regulations.

On-street Parking
A recent California decision resulted in the exten­sion of ADA accessibility guidelines to on-street parking where no requirement existed in the regula­tions themselves. In Fortyune v. City of Lomita, 766 F. 3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2014), the City of Lomita, Calif., was sued by a private citizen for failure to provide on-street accessible diagonal stall parking. The city attempted to dismiss the suit on the basis that the ADA regulations did not require accessible on-street parking spaces. The lower court denied the city’s motion, finding “all public services must be readily accessible” to individuals with disabilities, “whether or not a federal agency has created spe­cific guidelines for a particular service.” The court relied on the intent of the ADA regulations that make it unlawful to deny public service to individu­als with disabilities.

This decision was upheld on appeal. The Ninth Circuit panel who considered the case noted that the absence of architectural guidelines does not preclude the city from making its on-street parking facilities accessible to people with disabilities. The Ninth Circuit made the specific finding that on-street parking is a “program, service, or activity” for pur­poses of Title II similar to the treatment of sidewalks that public entities have to ensure the accessibility of, even though the Title II regulations do not specifi­cally address sidewalks.
The resulting effect from the decision was for cities to reevaluate and address the accessibility of on-street parking, as well as their other programs, services, and activities, to ensure compliance with longstanding statutory obligations to avoid dis­crimination against individuals with disabilities, re­gardless of whether detailed regulations or specific guidelines addressing those programs, services, and activities exist.

Parking operators should consult with their at­torneys and consultants to ensure compliance with ADA guidelines and for other potential liabilities to avoid the prevalent drive-by lawsuit.

Read the article here.

MICHAEL J. ASH, Esq., CRE, is a partner with Decotiis, Fitzpatrick, & Cole, LLP. He can be reached at mash@decotiislaw.com.

The Parking Professional: Technology of Parking and Market Disruption

By Jeff Pinyot

THE BUZZWORD IN BUSINESS IS “MARKET DISRUPTION.” The excitement about disrupting a market is that in the first place, we start with a thriving and confirmed market that is in the cross­hairs of investors. Take the parking industry: It doesn’t take much research to acknowledge that parking is huge and profitable, so it’s a market worthy of looking for possible cracks and creases for new methodologies and possible disruption. If it currently takes 10 different vendor or specialty groups, from hangtag suppliers to PARCs providers, to have a functioning piece of vehicle real estate, but only four would be needed through new disruptive technologies, the one who figures out the proverbial Rubik’s Cube would be disruptive and enjoy a lucrative result.

What does market disruption mean and why should you care about it? In layman’s terms, some­thing that disrupts a market is something that chal­lenges the way it’s always been done and threatens its conventional wisdom. Take Blockbuster video stores: Its former stores are now outlets for Hallow­een costumes in October and sparklers in July. The empty storefronts are a reminder of a disrupted mar­ket. Amazon Prime Video, Netflix, and others com­pletely disrupted the video rental business Wayne Huizenga created. Understand, there is still a market for watching movies—in fact a larger market that also includes the new verb “binge-watching.” We watch our entertainment in a more efficient manner. Similarly, parking won’t go away disrupted—it will just be done differently.

I once heard “Shark Tank” investor Mark Cuban say he would invest in any disruptor of a proven market. Look at our industry, for example. Parking reservation apps are huge market disruptors and getting plenty of attention from venture capital firms. When I go to Chicago overnight on business, I stay at the Palmer House. If I park my car with a valet, it’s going to cost me the price of tuition at nearby North­western University. But, if I use a parking app to find a space, I’ll save a bundle. That is market disruption. There will always be an alternative to the posted rate.

What does market disruption mean and why should you care about it? In layman’s terms, something that disrupts a market is something that challenges the way it’s always been done and threatens its conventional wisdom.

Case Study: Pittsburgh
There are three market disruptors in Pittsburgh—three companies building autonomous vehicles. Why Pittsburgh? One reason: the Pittsburgh left (hang on—I’ll explain)! Well, that’s the main reason, but there are others. First, the city’s streets are not in a grid pattern. There are more bridges in Pittsburgh than in Venice, Italy.

Then, there is the Pittsburgh left. Say you are in a left-hand turn lane waiting for a green light, but the light turns green and there is no turn arrow. What to do? Not a problem if you are first in line in Pittsburgh. The first car in line to go left simply turns in front of the oncoming traffic and without anyone getting killed. It’s courtesy in the ‘Burgh to let the first driver through. The autonomous vehicle companies figured that if their driverless cars could do that, they can drive anywhere.

Transportation network companies (TNCs) Uber and Lyft have severely injured the taxi cab market, but they are also affecting airport parking. Smart airport parking operations are finding ways to make money from these disruptors. The reduced cost of TNCs means people who live closer to the airport Uber or Lyft there instead of driving and parking. Everyone has their own equation as to the economics of Ubering versus driving and parking. But on the business side, fees for TNCs to enter airports and defined staging areas that require payment by the TNCs are making up some of the losses.

New Innovations
Frictionless parking is on everybody’s mind in the parking world. What innovation will we see next? One of the big areas the industry has seen growth is in parking guidance systems (PGS). There are many players in that industry, from pucks to ultrasonic to camera-based. PGS can be costly but also can be justified quite easily, as their systems attract parkers to specific facilities. Some operators still guess when the garage is full and put the sign out proclaiming such. I’ve driven by many “full” garages where two or three cars were leaving.

Finding the Right Disruptors
When considering a new disruptive technology, ask questions! Competitors of new technologies might try to sink the claims of new innovators. Claims that wireless technologies aren’t proven, for exam­ple, challenge conventional wisdom, considering almost no one has wired phones anymore and we can stream hi-def videos on our smart devices almost anywhere. The owner who thinks ahead will not only still be in business but will be making more money than ever before. Embrace and be flexible. As autonomous vehicles become common, parking spaces will shrink from nine feet to seven feet wide. Systems will have to adapt—and some already have. Buyers need to think ahead.

Thinking Ahead
Rick West is an alt-use specialist and CEO of the Millennium Parking Garage concession in Chicago, Ill. He is always looking for alternative uses for that massive behemoth. Have an alternative use plan in place so you aren’t left with open space and an emp­ty wallet. Some alt uses are making more money than do parking spaces. As an industry, we should freely share best practices in this area.

A way of protection from empty spaces is right-sizing a garage. In right-sizing, design a garage that is the correct size and is flexible and fluid to the actual needs it will see. The best example I have is a mixed-use property that offers public parking on the lower three levels and gated resident parking on the top five levels. This guess rarely pays off. Rather than gating the top five levels, use a flexible line of demarcation. Expand the resident parking from the top down through a PGS and sell the extra spaces to the public, rather than having empty and unsellable spaces beyond the gate.

Change is good and prepared change is better. What new market disruptors will we see in the next few years? Chicken Little, the sky is not falling, and no, little boy, there is no wolf!

Read the article here.

JEFF PINYOT is president of ECO Falcon Vision IPGS/ECO Lighting Solutions and member of IPMI’s Sustainability Committee. He can be reached at jspinyot@ecoparkinglights.com.

 

Honoring an Urbanist

The work of Jane Jacobs and what it means to parking.

2018-12 Urbanist 1 2018-12 Urbanist 2

By L. Dennis Burns, CAPP

On a recent project trip to Boise, Idaho, I was invited to wait in the conference room of our client, the Capital City Develop­ment Corporation, or CCDC, until other meeting attendees arrived. I had been in this conference room in the past, but it was a little different this time.
The agency had renamed the conference room the Jane Jacobs Room to honor the noted urbanist and activist who offered a new vision for diverse and vibrant urban redevelopment that prioritized people over automobiles. A small card was on a table in the waiting room outside that listed 10 of Jacobs’ princi­ples the CCDC, Boise’s urban redevelopment agency, has embraced in its daily work:

1. Eyes on the street.
2. Social capital.
3. The generators of diversity.
4. Form still follows function.
5. Local economies.
6. Innovation.
7. Make many little plans.
8. Gradual money.
9. Cities as organized complexity.
10. Citizen science.

I have run across many urban planners during my career whose critical thinking, innovative ap­proaches, and practical applications changed the way I think about urban environments. This in­cludes such names as Jan Gehl (Life Between Build­ings), Daniel Hudson Burnham (Chicago architect and planner), Kevin Andrew Lynch (The Image of the City), and contemporary planners such as John Fregonese from Portland, Ore., with whom I had the pleasure of working on a project in Dallas, Texas.

A Little More About Jacobs
The card outside the conference room inspired me to learn more about Jane Jacobs. In her 1961 book, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities,” she critiqued 1950s urban planning policies, which she believed were responsible for the decline of many city neighborhoods in the U.S. Going against the mod­ernist planning dogma of the era, Jacobs proposed a newfound appreciation for organic urban vibrancy in the United States.
Jacobs argued that modernist urban planning neg­atively affected cities because it rejected the value of human beings living in a community characterized by layered complexity and seeming chaos. The modernist planners preferred to use deductive reasoning to devel­op principles by which to plan cities. Among these poli­cies, she considered urban renewal the most dangerous and prevalent of the era. These policies, she claimed, destroy communities and innovative economies by creating isolated, unnatural, urban spaces.

In their place Jacobs advocated for what she called “four generators of diversity” that create effective eco­nomic pools of use and emphasized the importance of place. Her four generators of diversity were:

  • Mixed primary uses, activating streets at different times of the day.
  • Short blocks, allowing high pedestrian permeability.
  • Buildings of various ages and states of repair.
  • Density.

She sought to better understand and develop con­cepts for the role of cities in the economy. She felt the importance of a sense of place and multi-dimensional diversity in urban policy and design allows us to see the multiplicity of economies and working cultures, in which regional, national, and global economies are embedded.

Parking and Mobility
In reviewing the 10 urban planning principles noted above, I was struck by how closely they resembled many of the planning principles I have adopted from multiple sources over the years:

  • Eyes on the Street: Pedestrian traffic throughout the day, and the watchful eyes that come with it, en­hance the safety of city streets. In my work with the Interna­tional Downtown Association, I got to know and appreciate business improvement dis­tricts and downtown devel­opment authorities that run downtown clean-and-safe pro­grams as a primary strategy for urban area revitalization. The eyes-on-the-street principle has become well accepted and has, in fact, become a central tenet of the policies endorsed by the philosophy of crime pre­vention through environmen­tal design (CPTED).
  • Social Capital: The idea that every day activities and interactions that occur in an area create a net­work of relationships between neighbors and gener­ate social capital is central to Jacobs’ philosophy. As I have seen the parking profession grow and mature, I see parking professionals becoming more actively engaged in their communities and in the process of building foundations of mutual trust, shared efforts, and resilience in times of trouble. Examples include parking professionals who serve on multiple com­munity boards or other civic institutions and offer programs such as food for fines (pay parking fines with food donations), forget the fines (pay parking fines with homeless center donations), etc. I think Jacobs would have endorsed activities and pro­grams such as these.
  • The Generators of Diversity: Four factors in city planning and design help make the city diverse, safe, social, convenient, and economically vibrant. These are mixed uses, aged buildings, small blocks, and population density. Certainly, modern parking garage design has embraced mixed-use facilities and enhanced architecture, and there are sever­al that have embraced historic preservation by integrating old building facades into new garage designs. Emerging trends such as automated and adaptive reuse garages are useful concepts for sup­porting denser urban environments in the future.
  • Form Still Follows Function: Fashions and tech­nologies come and go, but what always remains relevant are the countless ways that people use the city, how the city works as a whole, and whether our urban design and planning reflect and serve those functions. Adapting to changing environments and technologies is at the heart of modern parking management. Adopting new curb-lane management strategies to support ride hailing and other shared mobility innovations is a good example.
  • Local Economies: Economic growth, whether local, national, or global, relies on the ability of urban economies to provide amply and diversely for themselves, rather than relying on imports. A key focus of my work the past decade has involved advancing the concept of parking as a tool for com­munity and economic development. One compo­nent of this is leveraging parking infrastructure de­velopment to achieve a variety of other community benefits, such as green roofs, public art, integrated residential development, street-level retail, and community gathering places. Customer-friendly parking management is essential to supporting a diverse set of business enterprises, especially in dense urban environments.
  • Innovation and Creativity: The greater the diver­sity of existing work in a local economy, the more opportunities to add new work and recombine old work in new ways. Parking structures can reflect community personality as well as cultural and social diversity. One of my favorite examples of this is the city of Eugene, Ore.’s, Step into Poetry program, along with its colorful garage murals, art-wrapped multi-space meters, and other public art projects.
  • Make Many Little Plans: The diversity of a good neighborhood can only be achieved when we allow many different people to pursue their own little plans, individually and collectively. My first reaction to this principle was to contrast it with Daniel Burn­ham’s famous quote: “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably them­selves will not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work.” After I let this contrast marinate a little, I realized that while these two statements seem to be at odds with each other, they are actually quite complementary. Both are needed to advance and sustain urban environments and their essential vitality and functionality.
  • Gradual Money: Both diverse little plans and new kinds of work require diverse little sources of mon­ey available on an ongoing basis. Unfortunately, both public and private sources often only provide money floods and money droughts instead. I have been impressed in recent years to see local park­ing programs stepping up to be funding sources or partners to support projects that benefit their communities’ larger strategic goals. Examples in­clude parking programs being financial supporters of downtown master plan projects or community bike-share programs.
  • Cities as Organized Complexity: Cities function like ecosystems. Everything is connected to every­thing else in intricate, particular ways that cannot be captured well by statistics or formulas. Only close observation and reasoning from the bottom up will do. My work in cities has always held a fascination with the marvelous and often unexpected ways that dense, multicultural environments express themselves in urban settings. The rich and creative cultural stew created by so many diverse groups and activities can truly be magical (and even a little grit­ty at times). This authenticity is powerful and pal­pable, especially when contrasted to newer lifestyle centers that try to emulate urban cities but often come off feeling staged or contrived.
  • Citizen Science: The people best equipped to un­derstand urban complexity are ordinary interested citizens. Without the assumptions that often come with professional training, everyday users of the city can learn more freely from what they see and experience firsthand. I have spent my fair share of time attending or presenting to city council meet­ings and other community forums. Reinforcing this principle, I have often been impressed with the insights brought by the engaged citizens who attend these meetings. Their insights are grounded in their firsthand knowledge and experience of their com­munities. Merging these local insights into larger planning concepts through engaged community outreach always improves community planning in my opinion.

In Summary
While many of these concepts have become bedrock planning principles, it is often the simplest ideas that have the biggest effects. I am happy that many, if not all, of these principles are being integrated in day-to-day parking management programs across the country!

Read the article here.

L. DENNIS BURNS, CAPP, is regional vice president and senior practice builder with Kimley-Horn. He can be reached at dennis.burns@kimley-horn.com.